In whom and why a dual-analog insulin aspart + degludec is worth to be used? Review article

Main Article Content

Mariusz Dąbrowski

Abstract

Recent years have brought significant paradigm changes in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. After the announcement of the results of the first and subsequent studies on the cardiovascular safety of antidiabetic drugs, non-insulin drugs came to the forefront, with sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists occupying a special place (the latter are recommended as the first injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes). This resulted in a slight decrease in the number of patients treated with insulin. Nevertheless, it should be remembered that in the population of people with type 2 diabetes, many patients will sooner or later need to implement insulin therapy. It is usually initiated with a single injection of basal insulin, which in our circumstances is usually NPH insulin. The lack of effectiveness of this therapy requires further intensification of treatment by adding further injections of mealtime insulin. One of available options is to use a combination of the fast-acting analog insulin aspart (IAsp) and the ultra-long-acting analog insulin degludec (IDeg) in one pen, each maintaining its own pharmacokinetic profile. The advantage of this option is fewer injections with comparable or better glycemic control compared to other treatment regimens, and the additional benefit for the patient is the reduction of hypoglycaemia, especially nocturnal. This treatment allows further intensification of therapy by adding a second injection of IDegAsp, or subsequent injections of mealtime insulin. IDegAsp insulin can also be used to initiate insulin therapy in conditions of severe hyperglycaemia, to replace therapy with premixed human or analog insulins with one or two injections of IDegAsp insulin, and even this does not exhaust the full spectrum of its possible applications. In summary, IDegAsp insulin is a valuable and safe supplement to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 and type 1 diabetes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dąbrowski, M. (2023). In whom and why a dual-analog insulin aspart + degludec is worth to be used?. Medycyna Faktow (J EBM), 16(2(59), 227-233. https://doi.org/10.24292/01.MF.0223.15
Section
Articles

References

1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, Draznin B, Aroda VR et al. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45(suppl 1): S125-S143.
2. Araszkiewicz A, Bandurska-Stankiewicz E, Borys S et al. Zespół ds. Zaleceń. Zalecenia kliniczne dotyczące postępowania u chorych na cukrzycę 2022. Stanowisko Polskiego Towarzystwa Diabetologicznego. Curr Top Diabetes. 2022; 2(1): 1-134.
3. Ahlqvist E, Storm P, Käräjämäki A et al. Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018; 6(5): 361-9.
4. Zaharia OP, Strassburger K, Strom A et al. Risk of diabetes-associated diseases in subgroups of patients with recent-onset diabetes: a 5-year follow-up study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019; 7(9): 684-94.
5. Dennis JM, Shields BM, Henley WE et al. Disease progression and treatment response in data-driven subgroups of type 2 diabetes compared with models based on simple clinical features: an analysis using clinical trial data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019; 7(6): 442-51.
6. Haahr H, Fita EG, Heise T. A Review of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties and Their Implications in Clinical Use. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017; 56(4): 339-54.
7. Heise T, Hermanski L, Nosek L et al. Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady-state conditions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012; 14: 859-64.
8. Onishi Y, Ono Y, Rabøl R et al. Superior glycaemic control with once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral drugs: a randomized, controlled phase 3 trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013; 15(9): 826-32.
9. Kumar A, Franek E, Wise J et al. Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Glargine (U100) for 52 Weeks in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10): e0163350.
10. Philis-Tsimikas A, Astamirova K, Gupta Y et al. Similar glycaemic control with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in a 38-week trial comparing the IDegAsp co-formulation with insulin glargine U100 and insulin aspart in basal insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019; 147: 157-65.
11. Rodbard HW, Cariou B, Pieber TR et al. Treatment intensification with an insulin degludec (IDeg)/insulin aspart(IAsp) co-formulation twice daily compared with basal IDeg and prandial IAsp in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled phase III trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016; 18: 274-80.
12. Franek E, Haluzík M, Canecki Varžić S et al. Twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart provides superior fasting plasma glucose control and a reduced rate of hypoglycaemia compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2016; 33: 497-505.
13. Fulcher GR, Christiansen JS, Bantwal G et al. Comparison of insulin degludec/insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart 30 in uncontrolled, insulin- treated type 2 diabetes: a phase 3a, randomized, treat-to-target trial. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37: 2084-90.
14. Christiansen JS, Niskanen L, Rasmussen S et al. Lower rates of hypoglycemia during maintenance treatment with insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30: a combined analysis of two Phase 3a studies in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes. 2016; 8(5): 720-8.
15. Hirsch IB, Bode B, Courreges JP et al. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart administered once daily at any meal, with insulin aspart at other meals versus a standard basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 26-week, phase 3, randomized, open-label, treat-to-target trial. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35(11): 2174-81.
16. Hirsch IB, Franek E, Mersebach H et al. Safety and efficacy of insulin degludec/insulin aspart with bolus mealtime insulin aspart compared with standard basal-bolus treatment in people with Type 1 diabetes: 1-year results from a randomized clinical trial (BOOST® T1). Diabet Med. 2017; 34(2): 167-73.
17. Battelino T, Deeb LC, Ekelund M et al. Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A randomized trial. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018; 19(7): 1263-70.
18. Fulcher GR, Akhtar S, Al-Jaser SJ et al. Initiating or Switching to Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World, Prospective, Non-interventional Study Across Six Countries. Adv Ther. 2022; 39(8): 3735-48. [korekta w: Adv Ther. 2023; 40(1): 389-90].
19. Semiz GG, Selimoğlu İ, Arayici ME et al. Evaluation of the efficiency of insulin degludec/insulin aspart therapy in controlling hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a real-life experience. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2022. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-022-01140-w.