Identical symptoms, different diagnosis – foreign body or neoplasm? Case study

Main Article Content

Jacek Kordiak
Joanna Lipińska

Abstract

A foreign body aspiration is most frequently manifested by: dyspnoea, sudden, persistent cough, hemoptysis. However, if the body doesn’t cause a complete obstruction of the airways, its presence in the bronchus may do not involve uncomfortable symptoms and the treatment consisting of removal of the foreign body (FB) during bronchoscopy may occur only after months or years from the moment of aspiration. This situation is most likely if the FB is small or when it is located in the distal parts of bronchi. We present a case of a patient who presented to the hospital with following symptoms: exertional dyspnoea, cough, exercise intolerance and loss of 8 kilos in 6 months time. Owing to the fact that former antibiotherapy implemented on the basis of diagnosed pneumonia turned out ineffective, parallel suspicions of foreign body aspiration and neoplasm have been drawn. It was not until the second bronchoscopy that the foreign body has been shown and removed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kordiak , J., & Lipińska , J. (2014). Identical symptoms, different diagnosis – foreign body or neoplasm? Case study. Alergoprofil, 10(3), 63-65. Retrieved from https://journalsmededu.pl/index.php/alergoprofil/article/view/816
Section
Article

References

1. Limper A., Prakash U.: Tracheobronchial Foreign Bodies in Adults. Ann. Intern. Med. 1990; 112: 604-609.
2. Zissin R., Shapiro-Feinberg M., Rozenman J. et al.: CT findings of the chest in adults with aspirated foreign bodies. ER 2001; 11(4): 606-11.
3. Dikensoy O., Usalan C., Filiz A.: Foreign body aspiration: clinical utility of flexible bronchoscopy. PMJ 2002; 78(921): 399-403.
4. Kam J., Doraiswamy V., Dieguez J. et al.: Foreign body aspiration presenting with asthma-like symptoms. Case Rep. Med. 2013: 317104. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/317104.
5. Wang X., Che G.: A plastic whistle incarcerated in bronchus diagnosed fourteen years after ‘swallowed’: a case report. JTD 2014; 6(6): 111-4.
6. Rangel L., Lopes A., Saito E. et al.: An unexpected subglottic foreign body diagnosed two years after aspiration. Lung 2013; 191(3): 311-2.
7. Quinn K., Rowan S., Rendall J.: An unusual cause of pneumonia: seen but not heard. BMJ Case Rep. 29.11.2013. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-008572.
8. Ristić L., Rančić M., Stanojević D. et al.: Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent non-resolving pneumonia – the case of foreign body aspiration in adult mimicking lung neoplasm. Med. Glas. 2014; 11(1): 238-40.
9. Bodart E., Gilbert A., Thimmesch M.: Removal of an unusual bronchial foreign body: rigid or flexible bronchoscopy? Acta Clin. Belg. 2014; 69(2): 125-126.
10. Boyd M., Watkins F., Singh S. et al.: Prevalence of flexible bronchoscopic removal of foreign bodies in the advanced elderly. Age Ageing 2009; 38(4): 396-400.