Could influenza be a possible biological warfare agent? Part II
Main Article Content
Abstract
The threat of the use of biological weapons in the current terrorist reality becomes more real. Thus, understanding the present state of knowledge in the early detection of biological warfare agents, including the flu virus, and the possibility of conducting effective virological analyses, becomes a necessity for laboratory diagnosticians, physicians and nurses. The plans to prevent the consequences of a potential biological attack can only be based on the interpretation and extrapolation of hypothetical data, experimental data or can be based on events from the past. The preparation for this threat, which may or may not occur, requires sound knowledge of the causative agent. Spraying such a causative agent in an aerosol form is considered to be an especially dangerous action in the bioterror as it carries a risk to large populations of the people affected. Hypothetical objects of the attack can include places of special population density. Critical places to perform an attack using biological aerosols are highly urbanized areas, which have efficient air conditioning systems (public buildings and subway stations). This paper was presented as a oral presentation of the same title at The International Conference – Advances in Pneumology. October 25–26, 2013 Kassel, Germany [1].
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright: © Medical Education sp. z o.o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)
References
2. Daniszewski P. Bioterrorism – a threat to regional and global security. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 2013, 1: 28-34.
3. Plusa T, Jahnz-Rozyk K. Biological weapons: threat and prevention. Medpress, Warsaw 2002: 1-132.
4. Schoch-Spana M. Implications of pandemic influenza for bioterrorism response. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000, 31: 1409-13.
5. Czuba K, Mazurkiewicz M, Kamiński K et al.: Bioterrorism – threat, rules of conduct, legal regulations. Bulletin from the Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw 2011, 2: 28-33 [online: http://biuletynfarmacji.wum.edu.pl].
6. Krug RM. The potential use of the influenza virus as an agent for bioterrorism. Antiviral Research 2003, 57: 147-150.
7. Bartoszcze M, Kocik J. Selected problems regarding protection against bioterrorism. Military Pharmacy and Medicine 2009, 2(3): 19-22.
8. Drzewiecki A. Effective influenza prophylaxis. Infections 2008, 5: 50-53 [in Polish].
9. Denys A. Severe viral infections of the respiratory tract. Int Rev Allergol Clin Immunol Family Med 2013, 19(1): 24-28.
10. Public health response to biological and chemical weapons. WHO guidance. Second edition of health aspects of chemical and biological weapons: reports of a WHO Group of Consultants. WHO 2004, 1-328.
11. Madjid M, Lillibrdge S, Mirhaji P et al.: Influenza as a bioweapon. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2003, 96: 345-346.
12. Woodard JL, Bray BS, Williams D et al. Call to action: integrating student pharmacist, faculty, and pharmacy practitioners into emergency preparedness and response. J Am Pharm Assoc 2010, 50: 158-164.
13. Pappas G, Panagopoulou P, Akritidis N. Reclassifying bioterrorism risk: are we preparing for the proper pathogens? J Infect Public Health 2009, 2: 55-61.
14. Brydak LB. Influenza, pandemic flu: myth or real threat? Rhythm, Warsaw 2008, 1-492 [in Polish].
15. Bhavsar TR, Kim HJ, Yu Y. Roles and contributions of pharmacists in regulatory affairs at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention for public health emergency preparedness and response. J Am Pharm Assoc 2010, 50: 165-168.
16. Russell C, Fonville JM, Brown AE et al. The potential for respiratory droplet-transmissible A/H5N1 influenza virus to evolve in a mammalian host. Science 2012, 336: 1541-1547.
17. [online: http://wakenews.net/html/jane_burgermeister.html"http://wakenews.net/html/jane_burgermeister.html].
18. [online: http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/04 ].