Ocular surface and contact lenses

Article Sidebar

PDF (Język Polski)


Published: Mar 31, 2014
Keywords:
dry eye syndrome, contact lenses, silicane hydrogeles, lens surface properties, Oculae Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

Main Article Content

Anna M. Ambroziak
Zakład Optyki Informacyjnej, Instytut Geofizyki, Wydział Fizyki, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to summarize ocular surface problems within contact lens wearers. The author present classification and pathogenesis of dry eye syndrome and pay attention to the importance of this problem in case of contact lens candidates and contact lens wearers. An appropriate attitude how to manage this problem is also described. The paper discusses the most popular indexes and questionnaires with particular emphasis on Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), as well as the correlation of results from clinical trials with those from biological ones, and their practical implementation as far as use of contact lenses and clinical studies are concerned. Dry Eye Work Shop (DEWS) to screen, diagnose and monitor dry eye disease. A practical sequence of tests: • clinical history • fluorescein BUT • ocular surface staining grading with fluorescein/yellow filter • Schirmer I test without anesthetic, or I with anesthetic, and/or Schirmer II with nasal stimulation • lid and meibomian morphology • meibomian expression • other test may be added according to availability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Ambroziak AM. Ocular surface and contact lenses. Ophthatherapy [Internet]. 2014Mar.31 [cited 2024Nov.22];1(1):48-4. Available from: https://journalsmededu.pl/index.php/ophthatherapy/article/view/671
Issue
Vol 1 No 1 (2014)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright: © Medical Education sp. z o.o. License allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)

References

1. Rumpakis J. New Data on Contact Lens Dropouts: An International Perspective. Rev Optom. 2010; 147(1): 37-42.
2. DEWS. The Definition and Classification of Dry Eye Disease: Report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Work Shop. Ocul Surf. 2007; 5(2): 65-204.
3. DEWS Methodologies to diagnose and monitor dry eye. Report of the Diagnostic Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007; 5: 108-52.
4. Asbell PA, Lemp MA. Dry Eye Disease The Clinician’s Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment. Thieme, 2006: 28-31, 142-3.
5. Ambroziak AM. Zaburzenia powierzchni oka – jak indywidualizować leczenie? Okulistyka po Dyplomie. 2013; październik: 12-26.
6. Chalmers R. Overview of factors that affect comfort with modern soft contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2014; 37(2): 65-76.
7. Phillips AJ, Speedwell L. Contact lenses, Fifth edition. Butterworth Heinemann, Elsevier, 2007: 111-127.
8. Baudouin C. The pathology of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 45(Suppl. 2): S211-20.
9. Baudouin C. The vicious circle in dry eye syndrome: a mechanistic approach. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007; 30: 239-46.
10. Ambroziak AM, Mierzejewska D, Langwińska-Wośko E et al. Gruczoły Meiboma – podstawy anatomii, fizjologii oraz regulacji wydzielania. Kontaktologia i Optyka Okulistyczna. 2011; 3(31): 5-12.
11. Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ et al. The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Executive Summary. IOVS. 2011; 52(4): 1922-9.
12. Ambroziak AM, Woronkowicz M, Kita-Mosek M et al. Zmiany powierzchni oka związane z wiekiem a korekcja starczowzroczności. Dysfunkcja gruczołów Meiboma – epidemiologia, etiopatogeneza, czynniki ryzyka, postępowanie, podstawy leczenia. Kontaktologia i Optyka Okulistyczna. 2011; 4(32): 13-20.
13. Ambroziak AM, Langwińska-Wośko E, Korwin M. Osmolarność – aktualne spojrzenie na nowy standard w diagnostyce zaburzeń filmu łzowego. Kontaktologia i Optyka Okulistyczna. 2010; 1(25): 42-9.
14. Kawashima M, Tsubota K. Tear Lipid Layer Deficiency Associated With Incomplete Blinking A Case Report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2013; 13: 34-6.
15. Sweeney DF. Silicone Hydrogels Continuous-Wear Contact Lenses. Second edition. Butterworth Heinemann, Elsevier, 2004: 57-86.
16. Gasson A, Morris J. The Contact Lens Manual a Practical Guide to Fitting. Fourth edition. Butterworth Heinemann, Elsevier, 2010: 81-99.
17. Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED. Dry eye diagnosis and management in 2004. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15: 299-304.
18. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G et al. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118: 615-21.
19. Michael M, Stickenberger W, Puit H. The effectiveness of questionnaires on the determination of Contact Lens Induced Dry Eye. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2009; 29: 479-86.
20. Gothwal VK, Pesudovas K, Wright TA et al. McMonnies Questionnaire: Enhancing Screening for Dry Eye Syndromes with Rash Analysis. Cornea. 2010; 51(3): 1401-7.
21. Abertz L, Rajagopalan K, Mertzanis P et al. Development and validation of the Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assesment of the burden of dry eye on patients. Health and Quality of life Outcomes. 2011; 9: 111.
22. Ambroziak AM, Bielecka A, Langwińska-Wośko E. Kwestionariusze i indeksy okulistyczne w codziennej praktyce kontaktologicznej. Kontaktologia i Optyka Okulistyczna. 2013; 4(40): 12-4.