SMILE – characteristics of the procedure and the patients’ quality of life Review article

Article Sidebar

PDF PDF (Język Polski)


Published: Jun 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24292/01.OT.150721.X
Keywords:
ReLEx® SMILE, laser vision correction, quality of life

Main Article Content

Marika Wolniewińska
Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska w Poznaniu
Barbara Czarnota-Nowakowska
Klinika Okulistyczna Optegra w Poznaniu
Jagoda Wolniewińska
Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
Joanna Wierzbowska
Klinika Okulistyki, Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny w Warszawie
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6993-7518
Jarosław Kocięcki
Katedra Okulistyki i Klinika Okulistyczna, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7321-1835

Abstract

ReLEx® SMILE is a relatively new flapless laser vision correction procedure carried out exclusively by femtosecond laser which earned confidence among both physicians and patients. The procedure constitutes an alternative to LASIK, which was considered so far the golden standard in myopia and myopic astigmatism corrections. The present paper discusses the advantages of the ReLEx® SMILE in comparison with other types of laser vision correction, including the patients quality of life after ReLEx® SMILE.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Wolniewińska M, Czarnota-Nowakowska B, Wolniewińska J, Wierzbowska J, Kocięcki J. SMILE – characteristics of the procedure and the patients’ quality of life. Ophthatherapy [Internet]. 2021Jun.30 [cited 2024Nov.22];8(2):133-41. Available from: https://journalsmededu.pl/index.php/ophthatherapy/article/view/1325
Issue
Vol 8 No 2 (2021)
Section
Surgery and laser therapy
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright: © Medical Education sp. z o.o. License allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)

References

1. Titiyal JS, Kaur M, Shaikh F et al. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) techniques: patient selection and perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018; 12: 1685-99.
2. Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Reinstein DZ et al. Small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(3): 652-65.
3. Moshirfar M, Murri MS, Shah TJ et al. Initial single-site surgical experience with SMILE: a comparison of results to FDA SMILE, and the earliest and latest generation of LASIK. Ophthalmol Therapy. 2018; 7: 347-60.
4. Ganesh S, Brar S, Arra RR. Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm. Ind J Ophthalmol. 2018; 66(1): 10-9.
5. Yan H, Gong LY, Huang W et al. Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017; 10: 1436-45.
6. Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30: 590-6.
7. Ganesh S, Brar S, Patel U. Comparison of ReLEx SMILE and PRK in terms of visual and refractive outcomes for the correction of low myopia. Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38(3): 1147-54.
8. Janse AJ, Gemke RJ, Uiterwaal CS et al. Quality of life: patients and doctors don’t always agree: A meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57: 653-61.
9. Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D et al. Who Should Measure Quality of Life, the Doctor or the Patient? Br J Cancer. 1988; 57(1): 109-12.
10. Czarnota-Nowakowska B, Skonieczna K, Igras E. ReLEx SMILE – metoda laserowej korekcji wad wzroku nowej generacji. Okulistyka. 2018; 1: 28-33.
11. Chiche A, Trinh L, Baudouin C et al. SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) among the corneal refractive surgeries in 2018. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2018; 41: 650-8.
12. Dougherty PJ, Wellish KL, Maloney RK. Excimer laser ablation rate and corneal hydration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 118: 169-76.
13. Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE et al. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24(1): 85-9.
14. Reinstein DZ, Archer T, Bradley Randleman J. Mathematical Model to Compare the Relative Tensile Strength of the Cornea After PRK, LASIK, and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29(7): 454-60.
15. Wang D, Liu M, Chen Y et al. Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30: 702-7.
16. Wu D, Wang Y, Zhang L et al. Corneal biomechanical effects: Small‑incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser‑assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40: 954‑62.
17. Dou R, Wang Y, Xu L et al. Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics After Surface Ablation Refractive Surgery and Novel Lamellar Refractive Surgery. Cornea. 2015; 34: 1441-6.
18. Agca A, Ozgurhan EB, Demirok A et al. Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a prospective fellow eye study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014; 37: 77-80.
19. Waring GO. Quality of vision and freedom from optical correction after refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 1997; 13: 213-5.
20. Pallikaris IG. Quality of vision in refractive surgery. Barraquer Lecture. 1997. J Refract Surg. 1998; 14(5): 549-8.
21. Chen X, Wang Y, Zhang J. Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations after SMILE and Wavefrontguided Femtosecond LASIK for myopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17(1): 42.
22. Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30(4): 248-54.
23. Zhu X, Zou L, Yu M et al. Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: a 1-year outcome. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8): e0182251.
24. Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Three-Year Results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopia: Refractive Outcomes and Aberrations. J Refract Surg. 2015; 31(11): 719-24.
25. Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK et al. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105: 1512-22.
26. O'Brien TP, Li Q, Ashraf MF et al. Inflammatory response in the early stages of wound healing after excimer laser keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116: 1470-4.
27. Dong Z, Zhou X, Wu J et al. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: Comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98: 263‑9.
28. Gao S, Li S, Liu L et al. Early changes in ocular surface and tear inflammatory mediators after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e107370.
29. Marfurt CF, Kingsley RE, Echtenkamp SE. Sensory and sympathetic innervation of the mammalian cornea. A retrograde tracing study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989; 30(3): 461-72.
30. Aristeidou A, Taniguchi EV, Tsatsos M et al. The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015; 2: 12.
31. Wei S, Wang Y. Comparison of Corneal Sensitivity Between FS-LASIK and Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx Flex) or Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx Smile) for Myopic Eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013; 251(6): 1645-54.
32. Donnenfeld ED, Solomon K, Perry HD et al. The effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110: 1023-9.
33. Garcia-Zalisnak D, Nash D, Yeu E. Ocular surface diseases and corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014; 25(4): 264-9.
34. Toda I, Asano-Kato N, Komai-Hori Y et al. Dry Eye After Laser in Situ Keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 132(1): 1-7.
35. Miljanović B, Dana R, Sullivan DA et al. Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143(3): 409-15.
36. Le Q, Zhou X, Ge L et al. Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life in a non-clinic-based general population. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012; 12(1): 22.
37. Kawashima MUM, Uchino M, Yokoi N et al. Associations between subjective happiness and dry eye disease: a new perspective from the Osaka study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4): e0123299.
38. Zhang Y, Shen Q, Jia Y et al. Clinical outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2016; 32: 256-65.
39. Shen Z, Shi K, Yu Y et al. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0158176.
40. Lee JK, Chuck RS, Park CY. Femtosecond laser refractive surgery: small-incision lenticule extraction vs. femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015; 26(4): 260-4.
41. Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L et al. Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122: 669-76.
42. Ang M, Ho H, Fenwick E et al. Vision-related quality of life and visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(10): 2136-44.
43. Schipper H. Quality of Life: Principles of the Clinical Paradigm. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1990; 8(2-3): 171-85.
44. Garamendi E, Pesudovs K, Elliott DB. Changes in quality of life after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31: 153-43.
45. Klokova OA, Sakhnov SN, Geydenrikh MS et al. Quality of life after refractive surgery: ReLEx SMILE vs Femto LASIK. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019; 13: 561-70.
46. Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM et al. Simulated night vision after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42: 1173-80.
47. Han T, Zheng K, Chen Y et al. Four-year observation of predictability and stability of small incision lenticule extraction. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016; 16: 149.
48. Han T, Xu Y, Han X. Quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) results three years after SMILE and FS-LASIK. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020; 18(1): 107.
49. O’Brart DPS, Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW et al. Disturbances in night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Eye (Lond). 1994; 8: 46-51.
50. Damgaard IB, Ang M, Farook M et al. Intraoperative patient experience and postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASIK in a randomized, paired-eye, controlled study. J Refract Surg. 2018; 34: 92-9.
51. Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: Results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95(3): 335-9.
52. Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37(1): 127-37.
53. Vestergaard A, Ivarsen AR, Asp S et al. Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: Predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(11): 2003-10.
54. Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal J. Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(4): 822-8.