Comfort or health – a tough choice of contact lens fitter
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is a brief summary of the current state of knowledge about contact lens discomfort, the reasons for its occurrence and solutions to avoid it. There is also a discussion what should be the most important in contact lens fitting for the specialist.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Tokarzewski T. Comfort or health – a tough choice of contact lens fitter. Ophthatherapy [Internet]. 2014Mar.31 [cited 2024Dec.28];1(1):43-6. Available from: https://journalsmededu.pl/index.php/ophthatherapy/article/view/670
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: © Medical Education sp. z o.o. License allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)
References
1. Rumpkins J. New data on Contact Lens Dropouts – An International Perspective Review of Optometry 1/15/2010. http://www.revoptom.com/content/d/contact_lenses_and_solutions/c/18929/.
2. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort – Executive Summary 2013. http://www.tearfilm.org/tearfilm-reports-dews-report.php.
3. Brennan NA. Contact lens-based correlates of soft lens wearing comfort, American Academy of Optometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2009; 86: abstract 90957.
4. Chalmers R. Overview of factors that affect comfort with modern soft contact lenses. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye. 2014; 37: 65-76.
5. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens. 2006; 32: 281-6.
6. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barrado-Navascues E, Rubido-Crespo MJ. Ocular surface comfort during the day assessed by instant reporting in different types of contact and non-contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2010; 36: 96-100.
7. McMonnies CW. Psychological and other mechanisms for end-of-day soft lens symptoms. Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90: e175-81.
8. Young G, Holden B, Cooke G. Influence of soft contact lens design on clinical performance. Optom Vis Sci. 1993; 70: 394-403.
9. Saville JT, Zhao Z, Willcox MD et al. Detection and quantification of tear phospholipids and cholesterol in contact lens deposits: the effect of contact lens material and lens care solution. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 2843-51.
2. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort – Executive Summary 2013. http://www.tearfilm.org/tearfilm-reports-dews-report.php.
3. Brennan NA. Contact lens-based correlates of soft lens wearing comfort, American Academy of Optometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2009; 86: abstract 90957.
4. Chalmers R. Overview of factors that affect comfort with modern soft contact lenses. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye. 2014; 37: 65-76.
5. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens. 2006; 32: 281-6.
6. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barrado-Navascues E, Rubido-Crespo MJ. Ocular surface comfort during the day assessed by instant reporting in different types of contact and non-contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2010; 36: 96-100.
7. McMonnies CW. Psychological and other mechanisms for end-of-day soft lens symptoms. Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90: e175-81.
8. Young G, Holden B, Cooke G. Influence of soft contact lens design on clinical performance. Optom Vis Sci. 1993; 70: 394-403.
9. Saville JT, Zhao Z, Willcox MD et al. Detection and quantification of tear phospholipids and cholesterol in contact lens deposits: the effect of contact lens material and lens care solution. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 2843-51.