The evolution of intraocular lenses: from monovision to spiral optics Review article

Article Sidebar

PDF PDF (Język Polski)


Published: Jul 31, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24292/01.OT.170925
Keywords:
cataract, intraocular lenses, premium lenses, spiral optics

Main Article Content

Bogumił Wowra
1. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Barbara Hospital, Sosnowiec. 2. Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-6586
Olga Łach-Wojnarowicz
Department of Ophthalmology, St. Barbara Hospital, Sosnowiec
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1323-8440
Dariusz Dobrowolski
1. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Barbara Hospital, Sosnowiec. 2. Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8768-1691
Edward Wylęgała
1. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Barbara Hospital, Sosnowiec. 2. Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6707-5790

Abstract

Cataracts remain one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide, and their surgical treatment, which involves the removal of the cloudy lens and the implantation of an artificial intraocular lens (IOL), is highly effective and safe. Advances in technology have significantly expanded the range of lens options, allowing not only the restoration of visual acuity but also the correction of co-existing refractive errors and presbyopia. This review article presents current standards for the use of intraocular lenses and discusses various types of implants: from classic monofocal lenses and monovision strategies, through improved monofocal plus lenses, to advanced multifocal designs, EDOF, and innovative spiral lenses. Particular attention is paid to the optical properties of each type of IOL, their advantages, limitations, and impact on patients’ quality of life after surgery. The aim of this article is to help physicians and patients make informed choices about the most appropriate type of lens, tailored to their individual visual needs and expectations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Wowra B, Łach-Wojnarowicz O, Dobrowolski D, Wylęgała E. The evolution of intraocular lenses: from monovision to spiral optics. Ophthatherapy [Internet]. 2025Jul.31 [cited 2026Feb.22];12(2):158-62. Available from: https://journalsmededu.pl/index.php/ophthatherapy/article/view/3404
Issue
Vol 12 No 2 (2025)
Section
Surgery and laser therapy

Copyright: Medical Education sp. z o.o. License allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)

References

1. Stein JD, Grossman DS, Mundy KM et al. Severe adverse events after cataract surgery among medicare bene¬ciaries. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(9): 1716-23.
2. Rementería-Capelo LA, García-Pérez JL, Gros-Otero J et al. Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgeries Performed in One Year in a Private Practice Setting: Review of 2714 Procedures. J Ophthalmol. 2020; 2020: 2421816.
3. Kugelberg M, Lundström M. Factors related to the degree of success in achieving target refraction in cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34(11): 1935-9.
4. Stern B, Gatinel D. Presbyopia Correction in Lens Replacement Surgery: A Review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025; 53(6): 668-81.
5. Sieburth R, Chen M. Intraocular lens correction of presbyopia. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019; 9(1): 4-17.
6. Fernández J, Rocha-de-Lossada C, Zamorano-Martín F et al. Positioning of enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses between conventional monofocal and extended depth of focus lenses: a scoping review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023; 23(1): 101. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02844-1.
7. Keates RH, Pearce JL, Schneider RT. Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1987; 13: 557-60. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(87)80114-1.
8. Macsai MS, Fontes BM. Refractive enhancement following presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens implantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008; 19(1): 18-21. http://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f14d9f .
9. Fernández J, Ribeiro FJ, Rodríguez-Vallejo M et al. Standard for collecting and reporting outcomes of IOL-based refractive surgery: update for enhanced monofocal, EDOF, and multifocal IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022; 48(11): 1235-41. http://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001013.
10. Megiddo-Barnir E, Alió JL. Latest Development in Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: An Update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2023; 12(1): 58-79. http://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000590.
11. Unsal U, Sabur H. Comparison of new monofocal innovative and standard monofocal intraocular lens after phacoemulsi¬cation. Int Ophthalmol. 2021; 41(1): 273-82. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01579-y.
12. Huh J, Eom Y, Yang SK et al. A comparison of clinical outcomes and optical performance between monofocal and new monofocal with enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses: a case-control study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21: 365. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02124-w.
13. Gyory JF, Németh G, Pesztenlehrer N. Assessing the clinical outcomes of a novel EDOF intraocular lens: a functional classi¬cation approach. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1): 293. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04114-8.
14. Talan M, Penbe A, Akcay G. Comparision of a Novel Trifocal Intraocular Lens and a Monofocal Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Visual Performance and Quality of Life Scores. Beyoglu Eye J. 2025; 10(1): 1-8. http://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2025.70037.