Choosing the right surgical treatment for hyperopia Review article

Main Article Content

Jan Grzeszkowiak
Joanna Wierzbowska

Abstract

Several aspects make the treatment of hyperopia and selecting the treatment method challenging. This article has reviewed the main surgical options for hyperopia and factors that must be considered when choosing the right treatment. The modern refractive technology offers excellent options with the optimal choice of procedure being dependent on the level of refractive error, age of the patient and the unique anatomical factors in each case. Surgeons must perform a complete evaluation and risk-benefit assessment of the individual patient to select the best procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Grzeszkowiak J, Wierzbowska J. Choosing the right surgical treatment for hyperopia. Ophthatherapy [Internet]. 2022Jun.30 [cited 2022Aug.18];9(2):143-8. Available from: https://journalsmededu.pl/index.php/ophthatherapy/article/view/1794
Section
Surgery and laser therapy

References

1. Rosen E. Hyperopia – RLE, pIOL, or LVC? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34(2): 175-6.
2. Meduri A, Alessandrello F, Rechichi M et al. Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for the management of hyperopic regression after conductive keratoplasty. BMJ Case Reports CP. 2021; 14: e241144.
3. Lee BS. Accuracy and stability of hyperopic treatments. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014; 25(4): 281-5.
4. Barnett V, Barsam A. Update on Laser Vision Correction Versus Intraocular Lens Options. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2020; 8: 104-10.
5. Biscevic A, Pidro A, Pjano MA et al. Lasik as a Solution for High Hypermetropia. Med Arch. 2019; 73(3): 191-4.
6. Kaluzny BJ, Piotrowiak-Slupska I, Kaszuba-Modrzejewska M et al. Three-year outcomes after high hyperopia correction using photorefractive keratectomy with a large ablation zone. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2019; 103: 849-54.
7. Settas G, Settas C, Minos E et al. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia correction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 6: CD007112. http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007112.pub3.
8. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ et al. Outcomes for Hyperopic LASIK With the MEL 90® Excimer Laser. J Refract Surg. 2018; 34(12): 799-808. http://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20181019-01.
9. Reinstein DZ, Pradhan KR, Carp GI et al. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Hyperopia: 3-Month Refractive and Visual Outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2019; 35(1): 24-30. http://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20181025-01.
10. Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI et al. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Hyperopia: 12-Month Refractive and Visual Outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2019; 35(7): 442-50.
11. Spiru B, Torres-Netto EA, Kling S et al. Hyperopic SMILE Versus FS-LASIK: A Biomechanical Comparison in Human Fellow Corneas. J Refract Surg. 2021; 37(12): 810-5. http://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20210830-02.
12. Humayun S, Ishaq M, Fawad A et al. Assessment of Refractive Outcomes of Femtosecond-assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) for Hyperopia. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021; 30(4): 434-9. http://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2021.04.434.
13. Demir G, Sucu ME, Yıldırım Y et al. Long-term assessment of visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia using the AMARIS® 750S Excimer laser. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019; 42(7): 703-10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2019.02.006.
14. Mimouni M, Zoller L, Horowitz J et al. Cycloplegic autorefraction in young adults: is it mandatory? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 254: 395-8. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3246-1.
15. Brar S, Sute SS, Bagare SN et al. Functional Outcomes and Reading Speeds following PRESBYOND LBV Using Nonlinear Aspheric Ablation Profiles Combined with Micro-Monovision. J Ophthalmol. 2021; 2021: 2957443. http://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2957443.
16. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ et al. LASIK for presbyopia correction in emmetropic patients using aspheric ablation profiles and a micro-monovision protocol with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 and VisuMax. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28(8): 531-41. http://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20120723-01.
17. Williams LB, Dave SB, Moshirfar M. Correlation of visual outcome and patient satisfaction with preoperative keratometry after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34(7): 1083-8.
18. Delbarre M, Le HM, Boucenna W et al. Hypermétropie et chirurgie réfractive [Refractive surgery for hyperopia]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021; 44(5): 723-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2020.11.008.
19. Melki SA, Azar DT. LASIK complications: etiology, management, and prevention. Surv Opthhalmol. 2001; 46(2): 95-116.
20. Lwowski C, Kohnen T. Korneale Komplikationen nach hyperoper PRK [Corneal complications after PRK for hyperopia]. Ophthalmologe. 2020; 117(2): 150-3. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-019-0912-4.
21. Alfonso JF, Baamonde B, Belda-Salmerón L et al. Collagen copolymer posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia correction: three-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39(10): 1519-27. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.035.
22. Bartels MC, Santana NT, Budo C et al. Toric phakic intraocular lens for the correction of hyperopia and astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32(2): 243-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.083.
23. El Khatib L, Hatoum AK, Moukhadder HM et al. Transient crystalline lens deposits following the insertion of a phakic sulcus-fixated collamer intraocular lens in a hyperopic eye. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020; 17: 100598. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100598.
24. Gimbel HV, LeClair BM, Jabo B et al. Incidence of implantable Collamer lens-induced cataract. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018; 53(5): 518-22. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.11.018.
25. Kocová H, Vlková E, Michalcová L et al. Incidence of cataract following implantation of a posterior-chamber phakic lens ICL (Implantable Collamer Lens) – long-term results. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2017; 73(3): 87-93.
26. Fernandes P, González-Méijome JM, Madrid-Costa D et al. Implantable collamer posterior chamber intraocular lenses: a review of potential complications. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27(10): 765-76. http://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20110617-01.
27. Kohnen T, Kook D, Morral M et al. Phakic intraocular lenses: part 2: results and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(12): 2168-94. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.007.
28. Benda F, Filipová L, Filipec M. Correction of moderate to high hyperopia with an implantable collamer lens: medium-term results. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30(8): 526-33. http://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140711-05.
29. Nicula CA, Popescu R, Rednik AM et al. Refractive Lens Exchange in Hyperopic Presbyopes with the Acrysof IQ Panoptix Intraocular Lens: One-Year Results and Analysis of the Literature. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020; 16: 1125-37. http://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S279065.
30. Schallhorn SC, Schallhorn JM, Pelouskova M et al. Refractive lens exchange in younger and older presbyopes: comparison of complication rates, 3 months clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017; 11: 1569-81. http://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S143201.
31. Alió JL, Grzybowski A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it? Eye Vis (Lond). 2014; 1: 10. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-014-0010-2.
32. Alio JL, Grzybowski A, El Aswad A et al. Refractive lens exchange. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014; 59(6): 579-98.
33. Hengerer FH, Conrad-Hengerer I. Refraktiver Linsenaustausch [Refractive Lens Exchange]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017; 234(10): 1299-314. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-115030.
34. Barsam A, Allan BD. Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 6: CD007679.
35. Nanavaty MA, Daya SM. Refractive lens exchange versus phakic intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012; 23(1): 54-61.
36. Kook D, Kampik A, Kohnen T. Komplikationen des refraktiven Linseneaustausches. Ophthalmologe. 2008; 105: 1005-12. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-008-1829-5.
37. Ozulken K, Kiziltoprak H, Yuksel E et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Diffractive Trifocal and New Refractive/Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses for Refractive Lens Exchange. Curr Eye Res. 2021; 46(6): 811-7. http://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2020.1833347.
38. Schallhorn SC, Hettinger KA, Teenan D et al. Predictors of Patient Satisfaction After Refractive Lens Exchange With an Extended Depth of Focus IOL. J Refract Surg. 2020; 36(3): 175-84. http://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20200211-01.