Ultrasound ciliary plasty in refractory glaucoma treatment – a medium-term follow-up study Original reaserch study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound ciliary plasty (UCP) for treating refractory glaucoma during one year follow-up.
Material and methods: A total of 57 patients (37 F, 20 M; mean age: 67.6 years) with primary and secondary refractory glaucoma were enrolled to undergo UCP. The inclusion criteria for the study were: ≥ 18 years, uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (IOP > 21 mmHg), contraindication to incisional glaucoma surgery, intolerance to glaucoma medications despite well-controlled IOP. The exclusion criteria were: pregnancy, age < 18 years, IOP > 30 mmHg, angle-closure glaucoma and neovascular glaucoma. Complete ophthalmic examinations were performed preoperatively and as well as 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively. An IOP reduction of 20% or > 5 mmHg as compared to the baseline value was considered as successful treatment. Complete success was defined as cessation of antiglaucoma medications.
Results: The mean IOP at the last follow-up was reduced by 26.9%. The success rate was 87.7% and the complete success rate was 12.3%. The mean ± SD values of the number of antiglaucoma medications were: 4.0 ± 0.9, 0.9 ± 1.1, 0.9 ± 1.1, 1.1 ± 1.1, 1.8 ± 1.4, 2.1 ± 1.4, 2.4 ± 1.4 (p < 0.001 for all values), respectively. The best-corrected logMAR visual acuities were: 0.37 ± 0.46, 0.47 ± 0.45 (p = 0.003), 0.46 ± 0.45 (p = 0.004), 0.31 ± 0.37 (p = 0.151), 0.36 ± 0.45 (p = 0.880), 0.39 ± 0.47 (p = 0.504), respectively. Following the procedure, choroid detachment was observed in three patients (5.3%) and macular in two patients (3.5%). No other major intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred.
Conclusion: Ultrasound ciliary plasty is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in medium-term follow-up. Further studies with a larger group of patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: © Medical Education sp. z o.o. License allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Address reprint requests to: Medical Education, Marcin Kuźma (marcin.kuzma@mededu.pl)
References
2. Charrel T, Aptel F, Birer A et al. Development of a Miniaturized HIFU Device for Glaucoma Treatment With Conformal Coagulation of the Ciliary Bodies. Ultrasound MedBiol. 2011; 37: 742-54.
3. Aptel F, Charrel T, Lafon C et al. Miniaturized high-intensity focused ultrasound device in patients with glaucoma: A clinical pilot study. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 8747-53.
4. Bolek B, Ulfik Kl, Dembski M et al. Ultradźwiękowa plastyka ciała rzęskowego − technika zabiegu i wstępne wyniki. Mag Lek Okulisty. 2017; 11: 138-48.
5. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120: 701-13.
6. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma. Trial Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120: 1268-79.
7. Jankowska-Szmul J, Dobrowolski D, Wylegala E. CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery compared with trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma. A 1-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018; 96: e582-e91.
8. Vernon SA, Koppens JM, Menon GJ et al. Diode laser cycloablation in adult glaucoma: Long-term results of a standard protocol and review of current literature. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 34(5): 411-20.
9. Walland MJ. Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation: Longer term follow up of a standardized treatment protocol. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000; 28: 263-7.
10. Frezzotti P, Mittica V, Martone G et al. Longterm follow-up of diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 88: 150-5.
11. Pucci V, Tappainer F, Borin S et al. Long-term follow-up after transscleral diode laser photocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmologica. 2003; 217: 279-83.
12. Tan AM, Chockalingam M, Aquino MC et al. Micropulse transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 38: 266-72.
13. Pantcheva MB, Kahook MY, Schuman JS et al. Comparison of acute structural and histopathological changes in human autopsy eyes after endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91: 248-52.
14. Lin SC, Chen MJ, Lin MS et al. Vascular effects on ciliary tissue from endoscopic versus trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90: 496-500.
15. Berke S, Cohen A, Sturm R et al. Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation (Ecp) and Phacoemulsification in the Treatment of Medically Controlled Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2000; 9: 129.
16. Siegel MJ, Boling WS, Faridi OS et al. Combined endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in the treatment of mild to moderate glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015; 43: 531-9.
17. Noecker RJ, Kahook MY, Berke SJ et al. Uncontrolled intraocular pressure after endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma. 2008; 17(3): 250-1.
18. Noecker RJ, Group ECS. Complications of Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation. The ASCRS Symp Cataract IOL Refract Surgery; San Diego, CA. 2007; 24(4): 177-82.
19. Aptel F, Lafon C. Therapeutic applications of ultrasound in ophthalmology. Int J Hyperth. 2012; 28: 405-18.
20. Aptel F, Denis P, Rouland JF et al. Multicenter clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in glaucoma patients without previous filtering surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016; 94: 268-77.
21. Deb-Joardar N, Reddy K. Application of high intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of open-angle glaucoma in Indian patients. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018; 66: 517-23.
22. Giannaccare G, Vagge A, Sebastiani S et al. Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty in Patients with Glaucoma: 1-Year Results from a Multicentre Prospective Study. Ophthalmic Res. 2019; 61: 137-42.
23. Denis P, Aptel F, Rouland JF et al. Cyclocoagulation of the ciliary bodies by high-intensity focused ultrasound: A 12-month multicenter study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis Sci. 2015; 56: 1089-96. http://iovs.arvojournals.org/Article.aspx?doi=10.1167/iovs.14-14973.
24. Sousa DC, Ferreira NP, Marques-Neves C et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound cycloplasty: Analysis of pupil dynamics. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2018; 12: 102-6.
25. Bolek B, Wylegala A, Mazur R et al. Pupil irregularity after ultrasound ciliary plasty in glaucoma treatment. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019; 97: S263.
26. Bolek B, Wylęgała A, Wylęgała. Assessment of Scleral and Conjunctival Thickness of the Eye after Ultrasound Ciliary Plasty. J Ophthalmol. 2020; 2020: 9659014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9659014.