The ultrabiomicroscopic examination in diagnostics, treatment and management of patients with glaucoma Review article

Main Article Content

Grzegorz Jasina
Marta Misiuk-Hojło


Ultrabiomicroscopic (UBM) examination is a powerful diagnostic tool that can assist in the management and treatment of many patients. It is especially helpful in the case of glaucoma and damage to the optic nerve. We can successfully treat patients only if we are aware of the disease cause. Although UBM examination cannot replace a complete clinical examination (including dynamic gonioscopy), it is a great supplement that can confirm many diagnoses.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jasina G, Misiuk-Hojło M. The ultrabiomicroscopic examination in diagnostics, treatment and management of patients with glaucoma. Ophthatherapy [Internet]. 2020Sep.30 [cited 2021Jul.25];7(3):185-91. Available from:


1. Stodolska-Nowak A, Adamski W, Brązert A. Zastosowanie ultrabiomikroskopii w diagnostyce i monitorowaniu pacjentów z jaskrą. Okul Dypl. 2019; 2: 9-16.
2. Dietlein T, Engels B, Jacobi P et al. UBM-guided chamber angle surgery for glaucoma management: an experimental study. Eye. 2003; 17: 340-5.
3. Higgitt AC. The dark-room test. Br J of Ophthalmol. 1954; 38: 242-7.
4. Wang N, Lai M, Cheng X et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopic dark room provocative test. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1998; 34(3): 183-6, 12.
5. Dada T, Kumar G, Kumar Mishra S. Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Glaucoma: An Update. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2008; 2(3): 17-32.
6. Dada T, Gupta V, Deepak KK et al. Narrowing of the anterior chamber angle during Valsalva maneuver: A possible mechanism for angle closure. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006; 16: 81-91.
7. Kosmala J, Grabska-Liberek I. Ultrabiomikroskopia – zastosowanie w okulistyce. Termedia, Poznań 2014.
8. Méndez-Hernández C, Garcia-Feijoo J, Cuina-Sardina R. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in pigmentary glaucoma. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003; 78(3): 137-42.
9. Pillunat L, Bohm A, Fuisting B. Ultrasound biomicroscopyin pigmentary glaucoma. Ophthalmologe. 2000; 97: 268-71.
10. Rockwood E, Sharma S, Hayden B et al. Glaucoma. In: Singh A, Hayden B, Pavlin C (ed). Ultrasound Clinics. Elsevier Inc, USA, Canada 2008: 207-15.
11. Wei W, Yang W, Chen Z et al. A study on ocular anterior segment structure after scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1999; 35(4): 309-11, 317.
12. Fleck B, How large must an iridotomy be? Br J Ophthalmol. 1990; 74: 583-8.
13. Dada T, Mohan S, Sihota R et al. Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopic parameters after laser iridotomy in eyes with primary angle closure and primary angle closure glaucoma. Eye. 2007; 21: 956-61.
14. Kumar G. Prevalence of plateau iris in primary angle closure suspects, a UBM study. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 430-4.
15. Garudadri C, Chelerkar V, Nutheti R. An ultrasound biomicroscopic study of the anterior segment in Indian eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002; 1: 502-7.
16. Marigo F, Finger P. Anterior segment tumors: current concepts and innovations. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003; 48: 569-93.
17. Avitabile T, Russo V, Uva M et al. Ultrasound-biomicroscopic evaluation of filteringblebs after laser suture lysis trabeculectomy. Ophthalmologica. 1998; 212: 117-21.
18. Wu Q, Zhang Y, Song B et al Evaluation of the bleb morphology and the function of postfiltration surgery using slit-lamp adapted optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in glaucoma patients. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2008; 44: 402-7.
19. Mansouri K, Sommerhalder J, Shaarawy T. Prospective comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for evaluation of anterior chamber dimensions in European eyes with primary angle closure. Eye. 2010; 24(2): 233-9.