How should we manage lesions located in coronary bifurcations in 2017? Review article

Main Article Content

Adam Kern
Natalia Pietraszek
Olga Możeńska
Jacek Bil

Abstract

Procedures within coronary bifurcations stand for approximately 15–20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions. Unfortunately, although there are many literature data the choice of the best approach is still very controversial. The European Bifurcation Club prepared 11th Consensus summarizing the current recommendations on the treatment of lesions located in coronary bifurcations. In this document the lesion classification (Medina classification) as well as the treatment strategies classification (MADS classification) were reminded one more time. Also, the principles of choosing 1- vs 2-stent strategy, the role of kissing balloons technique as well as the proximal optimization technique were discussed. Additionally, the current views on the use of dedicated bifurcation stents and intracoronary imaging during PCI were presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kern , A., Pietraszek , N., Możeńska , O., & Bil , J. (2018). How should we manage lesions located in coronary bifurcations in 2017?. Cardiology in Practice, 11(4), 15-20. Retrieved from https://journalsmededu.pl/index.php/kwp/article/view/1232
Section
Articles

References

1. Lassen J.F., Holm N.R., Banning A. et al.: Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: 11th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2016; 12: 38-46.
2. Collet C., Onuma Y., Cavalcante R. et al.: Quantitative angiography methods for bifurcation lesions: a consensus statement update from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2017; 13: 115-123.